A groundbreaking study published in Nature has shown how dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) interact in the brain to shape associative learning and behavior. The researchers developed a mouse model that allowed them to simultaneously observe the activity of these molecules in the nucleus accumbens, a crucial area for reward processing.
The neuromodulators dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5HT) play essential roles in associative learning, which is the process of forming connections between stimuli and responses.
While it is known that these two chemical systems are crucial for shaping behaviors and emotions, there have been many questions about how exactly they interact in the brain.
Researchers have long known that both dopamine and serotonin influence learning and mood, but understanding how these molecules interact in the same brain to shape behavior has always been a technical challenge.
The difficulty has been in accessing and genetically manipulating both neuromodulatory systems simultaneously in a single organism.
A groundbreaking study from Stanford’s Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, published in Nature in November 2024, sheds new light on this interplay. It shows that dopamine and serotonin work both collaboratively and in opposition to shape learning and behavioral reinforcement.
The main goal of the study was to create a model that would allow observation of the actions of DA and 5HT in the same brain and to explore how these molecules influence the formation of new associations in learning.
To answer these questions, the researchers developed a highly specialized mouse model in which they were able to genetically access the neurons that produce dopamine and serotonin. This model was essential to allow simultaneous control and observation of the two neuromodulatory systems.
Anterograde tracing was used to identify the sites in the brain where dopamine and serotonin signals converge. This method involves labeling neurons to track the pathways that their signals follow.
The team found that the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a region known to regulate rewards and decision-making, is a crucial integration point for DA and 5HT signals.
Central serotonin and dopamine pathways. Image: Alejandro Campos et al. Brain Sciences 12(4): 431
The researchers recorded the activity of dopamine and serotonin axons in the nucleus accumbens using genetically encoded sensors. These sensors allow them to measure changes in the levels of these molecules in real-time, while the mice performed behavioral tasks.
The key finding was that when the mice received rewards, dopamine levels increased in the NAc, while serotonin levels decreased, suggesting that these molecules have opposite effects on reward processing.
To test the role of each molecule in learning and reinforcement, the scientists used optogenetics, a technique that uses light to activate or inhibit specific neurons.
Optogenetics: Molecules that enable neural control by light. Source: Synthetic Neurobiology Group
When the researchers weakened either dopamine or serotonin signals alone, the mice showed mild deficits in a reward-based learning task.
However, when both signals were reduced at the same time, learning and reinforcement were profoundly impaired.
The scientists also used optogenetics to artificially simulate the firing patterns of dopamine and serotonin. This combination was enough to drive the formation of new associations in learning, more effectively than either signal alone.
The results show that dopamine and serotonin act in opposite ways to shape behavior:
Dopamine: Amplifies the sensation of reward and facilitates associative learning.
Serotonin: Modulates and balances the effects of dopamine, acting as a kind of "brake" in situations of reinforcement.
This “oppositional” interaction in the nucleus accumbens is essential for adjusting the intensity of learning and avoiding extreme or inappropriate responses to stimuli.
This study is a pioneer in revealing how the dopamine and serotonin systems interact to shape complex behaviors. It demonstrates that these molecules do not work in isolation, but rather in a dynamic interaction that controls the formation of associations and behavioral reinforcement.
This discovery may have important implications for understanding and treating disorders related to dysregulation in these systems, such as depression, anxiety, and addiction.
READ MORE:
Opponent control of reinforcement by striatal dopamine and serotonin
Daniel F. Cardozo Pinto, Matthew B. Pomrenze, Michaela Y. Guo, Gavin C. Touponse, Allen P. F. Chen, Brandon S. Bentzley, Neir Eshel and Robert C. Malenka
Nature. 25 November 2024.
Abstract:
The neuromodulators dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT) powerfully regulate associative learning1–8. Similarities in the activity and connectivity of these neuromodulatory systems have inspired competing models of how DA and 5HT interact to drive the formation of new associations9–14. However, these hypotheses have not been tested directly because it has not been possible to interrogate and manipulate multiple neuromodulatory systems in a single subject. Here, we establish a mouse model enabling simultaneous genetic access to the brain’s DA and 5HT neurons. Anterograde tracing revealed the nucleus accumbens (NAc) to be a putative hotspot for the integration of convergent DA and 5HT signals. Simultaneous recording of DA and 5HT axon activity, together with genetically encoded DA and 5HT sensor recordings, revealed that rewards increase DA signaling and decrease 5HT signaling in the NAc. Optogenetically dampening DA or 5HT reward responses individually produced modest behavioral deficits in an appetitive conditioning task while blunting both signals together profoundly disrupted learning and reinforcement. Optogenetically reproducing DA and 5HT reward responses together was sufficient to drive athe cquisition of new associations and supported reinforcement more potently than either manipulation alone. Together, these results demonstrate that striatal DA and 5HT signals shape learning by exerting opponent control of reinforcement.
Comentarios