top of page

Between Words and Thoughts: Signs of Schizophrenia in Writing

  • Mar 24
  • 3 min read

People with schizophrenia can maintain the general idea of ​​a text, but they have difficulties in writing, such as repetition of words, lack of variety, and spelling errors. These patterns vary according to the type of symptoms.


Language is one of the main ways we express thoughts, emotions, and experiences. Therefore, changes in the way we speak or write can reveal a lot about how the brain works. In mental disorders like schizophrenia, these changes in language are quite common, but not always easy to understand.


This study sought to investigate how the symptoms of this condition appear in people's writing, helping to identify patterns that can contribute to diagnosis and treatment.


Schizophrenia is a complex mental disorder that can affect how a person thinks, perceives reality, and communicates. One of the most impacted aspects is language, especially in the way ideas are organized and transmitted. The researchers in this study wanted to better understand how these difficulties appear in writing.



To do this, they analyzed texts produced by people with schizophrenia, observing different levels of language. One of these levels involves the overall organization of the text, that is, whether the story makes sense as a whole.


Another level concerns how sentences and words connect to each other. The quality of the writing itself was also evaluated, including spelling and word structure.


Participants were asked to write a summary of a specific story. This type of task allows for the assessment of how the person understands, organizes, and reproduces information. From these texts, the researchers analyzed writing patterns and possible difficulties.



The results showed that, in general, participants were able to maintain the main idea of ​​the story and respect the sequence of events. This indicates that, at a broader level, the organization of the text was still preserved. However, difficulties arose at more detailed levels.


In sentence construction, repetition of words, little vocabulary variety, and simpler structures were common. This suggests a limitation in the way of expressing ideas with diversity and complexity. Despite this, the basic word formation was maintained, indicating that certain linguistic skills remain intact.



Another important point was the presence of difficulties in writing, such as frequent spelling errors. This pattern appeared in a generalized way among the participants, indicating that schizophrenia can also affect more technical aspects of written language.


Furthermore, the researchers identified differences related to the type of symptoms presented. People with so-called "positive" symptoms (such as disorganized thoughts or altered perceptions) tended to have more difficulty maintaining the overall coherence of the text. Those with "negative" symptoms (such as reduced emotional expression and initiative) presented more problems in writing, with more pronounced errors.



READ MORE:


Macrotextual, microtextual and writing analysis of texts written by people with schizophrenia differentiated by their symptoms

Alfonso Martínez-Cano, Alberto Martínez-Lorca,  Juan José Criado, and Manuela Martínez-Lorca

Journal of Writing Research, 17(2), 287-308.


Abstract:


Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that primarily affects the semantic and pragmatic aspects of language. The aim of this study was to analyze pragmatics at macrotextual, microtextual and writing levels in persons with schizophrenia in order to ascertain the narrative characteristics and determine the nature of such pragmatics according to positive and negative symptomatology. Cross-sectional and quasi-experimental study was conducted on a sample of 41 individuals with schizophrenia. An analysis of textual pragmatics was performed using the participants’ summary of "The Tale of Landolfo Rufolo". Macrotextual coherence was functional in that it presented key plot information and respected the timeline of the story. Microtextual cohesion was characterized by repetitions, low lexical variation, low syntactic complexity and maintained morphology. The participants' writing was consistent with a generalized dysorthographic profile. In addition, the present work revealed significant differences according to symptomatology. Individuals with positive symptomatology showed lower macrotextual coherence, while microtextual cohesion entailed a greater number of words and therefore greater lexical variation. In contrast, those with negative symptomatology presented a greater dysorthographic profile. This study provides a functional overview of written language in persons with schizophrenia, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary speech and language therapy intervention to enhance such individuals’ quality of life by favoring their social integration. 

 
 
 

Comments


© 2020-2026 by Lidiane Garcia

bottom of page